<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>paulmudgett.com &#187; PII</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paulmudgett.com/tag/pii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paulmudgett.com</link>
	<description>Information Security &#38; Business Leadership</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:32:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>More Legislation?  Hmmm.</title>
		<link>http://paulmudgett.com/2011/09/13/more-legislation-hmmm/</link>
		<comments>http://paulmudgett.com/2011/09/13/more-legislation-hmmm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National and State Privacy/Security Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PII]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulmudgett.com/?p=376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senator Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn, introduced new legislation aimed to prevent data breaches.   The proposed legislation includes federal requirements for customer notification in the event of a breach (something most States have been requiring for years) and requiring companies to provide two years of credit monitoring service.  There are fines and program requirements for regularly testing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://paulmudgett.com/2011/09/13/more-legislation-hmmm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do you know where your data is?</title>
		<link>http://paulmudgett.com/2010/12/03/do-you-know-where-your-data-is/</link>
		<comments>http://paulmudgett.com/2010/12/03/do-you-know-where-your-data-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 19:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insider threat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PII]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulmudgett.com/?p=274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where is your sensitive information? Many times the answer I hear is&#8230; &#8220;it&#8217;s stored in our database&#8221; but that unfortunately is only a partial answer.   If you look at the business process surrounding access to information, you may be surprised at where sensitive information ends up.   Have you considered: Printed documents &#8211; Hard copy printouts [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://paulmudgett.com/2010/12/03/do-you-know-where-your-data-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NJ Supreme Court impacts privacy expectation</title>
		<link>http://paulmudgett.com/2010/04/05/nj-supreme-court-impacts-privacy-expectation/</link>
		<comments>http://paulmudgett.com/2010/04/05/nj-supreme-court-impacts-privacy-expectation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National and State Privacy/Security Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disgruntled employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endpoint security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insider threat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PII]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulmudgett.com/?p=191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Jersey Supreme Court recently ruled that a company shouldn&#8217;t have read an ex-staffer&#8217;s private e-mails even though they were sent from her employer&#8217;s computer.    NorthJersey.com article. Interesting ruling which will certainly change some thoughts as to personal use of work computers.  While I&#8217;m a proponent of privacy rights, I&#8217;m torn on this particular [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://paulmudgett.com/2010/04/05/nj-supreme-court-impacts-privacy-expectation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010 Information Security Predictions</title>
		<link>http://paulmudgett.com/2010/01/03/2010-information-security-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://paulmudgett.com/2010/01/03/2010-information-security-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Awareness and Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business and Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National InfoSec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Cyber Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security vision]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulmudgett.com/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I may as well get on the 2010 prediction bandwagon. 1.  With the rush to get into the &#8220;cloud&#8221; businesses will sacrifice security for the promise of efficiencies.  Attacks will be focused on the applications placed in the cloud, not necessarily the underlying OS infrastructure.  I predict there will be a large compromise of information [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://paulmudgett.com/2010/01/03/2010-information-security-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House passes Data Breach legislation&#8230; jury still out</title>
		<link>http://paulmudgett.com/2009/12/14/house-passes-data-breach-legislation-jury-still-out/</link>
		<comments>http://paulmudgett.com/2009/12/14/house-passes-data-breach-legislation-jury-still-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National and State Privacy/Security Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Cyber Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PII]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulmudgett.com/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. House of Representatives has passed HR 2221, the Data Accountability and Trust Act.  This sets nationwide breach notification requirements that trump the patchwork of State laws that have been in effect with California leading the way in 2002.   The passage was written about in a Federal Computer Week article &#8220;House passes bill to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://paulmudgett.com/2009/12/14/house-passes-data-breach-legislation-jury-still-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Learning From Someone Else&#8217;s Breach</title>
		<link>http://paulmudgett.com/2009/11/20/learning-from-someone-elses-breach/</link>
		<comments>http://paulmudgett.com/2009/11/20/learning-from-someone-elses-breach/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Should Have Known Better]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security mistakes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulmudgett.com/?p=100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A subsidiary of manged health care provider Health Net Inc, just reported the loss of personal information for 1.5 million customers that occurred six months ago according to a ComputerWorld article.  Without knowing all the details of the situation, I can only speculate as to some of the security controls and thoughts of the Health [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://paulmudgett.com/2009/11/20/learning-from-someone-elses-breach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Cloud Does Not Absolve Responsibility</title>
		<link>http://paulmudgett.com/2009/11/17/the-cloud-does-not-absolve-responsibility/</link>
		<comments>http://paulmudgett.com/2009/11/17/the-cloud-does-not-absolve-responsibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security mistakes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulmudgett.com/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cloud computing certainly offers cost management opportunities for organizations straining to maintain server infrastructure but there is more to consider than just server management.  Security in the cloud simply has not had an opportunity to mature.  Protecting servers, which no doubt cloud providers can do pretty effectively, is different than protecting information.   Those organizations that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://paulmudgett.com/2009/11/17/the-cloud-does-not-absolve-responsibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ex-Lover Busted, But Not Totally to Blame</title>
		<link>http://paulmudgett.com/2009/09/21/ex-lover-busted-but-not-totally-to-blame/</link>
		<comments>http://paulmudgett.com/2009/09/21/ex-lover-busted-but-not-totally-to-blame/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Should Have Known Better]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workstation Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulmudgett.com/blog/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A 38-year-old Avon Lake, Ohio man is set to plead guilty to federal charges after spyware he allegedly meant to install on the computer of a woman he&#8217;d had a relationship with ended up infecting computers at Akron Children&#8217;s Hospital.   (Misdirected spyware infects Ohio hospital.  McMillan, Robert. 17 September 2009. ComputerWorld.) Graham certainly gets what [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://paulmudgett.com/2009/09/21/ex-lover-busted-but-not-totally-to-blame/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Just One Little E-mail&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://paulmudgett.com/2009/08/06/its-just-one-little-e-mail/</link>
		<comments>http://paulmudgett.com/2009/08/06/its-just-one-little-e-mail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 20:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Should Have Known Better]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security mistakes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulmudgett.com/blog/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How often is e-mail used to send documents and information that contains sensitive information?  I&#8217;ve seen consultants share sensitive information about clients this way as well as staff members just &#8220;trying to be helpful&#8221;.  I&#8217;m sure this happens all the time and it can be mitigated through training and providing staff the tools necessary to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://paulmudgett.com/2009/08/06/its-just-one-little-e-mail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nevada&#8217;s New Privacy Law</title>
		<link>http://paulmudgett.com/2009/07/10/nevadas-new-privacy-law/</link>
		<comments>http://paulmudgett.com/2009/07/10/nevadas-new-privacy-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National and State Privacy/Security Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PII]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulmudgett.com/blog/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SB227 was passed into law and goes into effect in January 2010.  It contains requirements for PCI compliance as well as encryption of personally identifiable information.  Like any legislation it has both good and bad pieces to it with potential loopholes.  ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://paulmudgett.com/2009/07/10/nevadas-new-privacy-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

